Tinder Profile Statistics: 802 reviews, the real numbers
Every number on this page is produced anonymously, in aggregate, from 802 real profile reviews run on RateSelf. No personal data is included; figures refresh daily.
388/1000
average profile score
Mean score across reviewed profiles, on a 0-1000 scale; below 500 counts as below average.
%87
of profiles start below average
Share of profiles scoring under 500 on their first review.
+181
points of average headroom
Average gap between the current score and the reachable score after the recommended fixes.
%95
of bios are empty or ineffective
Profiles whose bio scored 2/10 or lower.
%73
of photos get a change/retake verdict
Share of all reviewed photos the AI recommends replacing or reshooting.
%10,9
average estimated like rate
Estimated right-swipe rate of profiles as they currently stand.
The most common photo mistakes
Across 384 reviewed photos, the defects detected most often and how frequently they appear:
Low_light
32.8%
Eyes_occluded
11.2%
Face_missing
8.9%
Extreme_filter
6.8%
Low_resolution
6.5%
Blur
2.3%
How profile scores are distributed
Score distribution of reviewed profiles on the 0-1000 scale (500 = the average threshold):
0-199
2.9%
200-399
56.3%
400-599
37.9%
600-799
2.9%
800-1000
0%
How is this data produced?
RateSelf scores every uploaded profile photo 0-100 with AI, and produces a 0-1000 overall profile score plus an estimated like rate. The statistics on this page are anonymous aggregates of those reviews — no photos, names or personal data are included, and figures are recomputed once a day.
Get your own profile score →
Source: RateSelf review database (anonymous aggregates), last updated 2026-10-08. You may cite these statistics with attribution.